Unit Legal Methods Level 4

Assignment
Task 1
Law lecture notes
You are employed in a law firm and have been asked to prepare notes on the law and legal system in the UK for a talk that one of the partner's has been asked to give to prospective law students. You should include relevant legislation and cases to illustrate your points where appropriate.
You need to produce a file of notes for the lecture. In the file you must:
• Distinguish between primary, secondary and delegated legislations.
• Explain the hierarchy within statutory sources and the case law.
• Explain the impact of the Human Rights Act.
• Illustrate the operation of literal, golden and purposive rules of statutory interpretation.
• Analyse the structure of the criminal and civil courts
• Analyse the role of the judiciary and the judicial appointment process.
• Analyse the function of the jury in criminal trials.
• Assess the duty and powers of the police.
• Assess the role of the Crown Prosecution Service.
• Examine the latest reforms to the civil justice process.
For a Merit grade you must:
• Analyse parliamentary and governmental efforts to widen access to the legal profession.
• Compare and contrast the benefits and drawbacks of the different types of alternative dispute resolution.
For a Distinction grade you must:
• Analyse the tension between secondary legislations and the principle of separation of power.
• Analyse social, political and economic causes of miscarriages of justice.

Case analysis
You are asked to prepare an analysis of a case and explain how judicial precedent works in the English courts. The case you need to analyse and refer to in this exercise is Alcock v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Police (1992) which is a case related to the Hillsborough Stadium disaster in 1989.

In your case analysis you must:
• Explain the doctrine of judicial precedent.
• Distinguish between binding, non-binding and persuasive decisions.
For Merit grade you need to:
• Determine the ratio decidendi and obiter dictum from Alcock v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Police (1992)

Task 3

Mooting exercise
In preparation for a mooting exercise, you are asked to analyse the following scenario applying relevant cases and statutory provisions:
Harry Pollard is a delivery driver for a builder's merchants. When delivering to a large construction site, he witnessed the collapse and subsequent fire in a building in which several people were working. He witnessed the incident from the site office and was not close enough to be in any physical danger but saw some horrific sights as people fell from the top of the building and were burned in the fire. Pollard has been off work sick since the incident and is making a claim for psychiatric harm against the construction company.
Your analysis must:
• Explain the importance of a bundle in mooting exercises.
• Analyse and apply relevant cases and statutory provisions to the scenario.
• Present the arguments for the parties involved in the given mooting scenario.
For a Distinction grade you must:
• Evaluate the claim and the defence, based on the given scenario.

Attachment:- Legal-Methods.rar